Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bautista v. David Frankel Realty, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 2, 2008Published

1Dissent

Friedman, J.P.,

dissents in a memorandum as follows: As set forth later in this dissent, this Court has considered the issue of special employment in the building management context in at least eight recent decisions. In those cases, decided by benches that included members of the present majority, we found that a special employment relationship between the defendant managing agent and the plaintiff employee had been established as a matter of law. With breathtaking disregard for our precedents, the majority declines to follow these decisions without making a serious effort to distinguish them…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Fung v. Japan Airlines Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Ugijanin v. 2 West 45th Street Joint VentureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Villanueva v. Southeast Grand Street Guild Housing Development Fund Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Brunetti v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API