Lipham v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
1. “The right, under the Constitution of every State in the Hnited States, to regulate the matter of marriage and divorce within its own borders, and to defend it against encroachment, and to fix and declare the matrimonial status of its own citizens, is undoubted, and the full faith and credit provision of the Constitution is not to be construed so as to defeat this right, nor is the provision applicable at all save to judgments rendered with jurisdiction, which is the power to adjudge, and jurisdiction may be collaterally inquired into.” De Bouchel v. Candler, 296 Fed. 482. “Actual domicile…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Drake v. DrakeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Dyal v. DyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- De Bouchel v. CandlerDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1924
- Solomon v. SolomonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Field v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Chalker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990