Henderson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
By per curiam opinion this appeal was dismissed because of an untimely sentence. The statutory requirements have now been properly followed and we reinstate this appeal.
Appellant was convicted by a jury for burglary of a habitation. The punishment, enhanced under V.T.C.A., Penal Code Sec. 12.42(b), was assessed by the jury at thirty years’ imprisonment.
In a ground of error appellant asserts:
“The trial court erred in allowing the use of a prior conviction for enhancement at the punishment stage, said prior conviction being set out in paragraph 2 of the indictment, Cause No.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Ex Parte McDonaldCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Ex Parte LangstonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Ex Parte HerreraCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Ex Parte AllenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970
3Cited by9 opinions
- Homan v. HughesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Hogue v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Chancy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Ex Parte RiversCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Alphonso Smith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.