Legal Opinion

People v. Darrisaw

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1980PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and *788the case remitted to that court for further consideration in accordance with this memorandum.

The substantive issue tendered for consideration on this appeal is whether defendant, on trial for sale and possession of controlled substances, was entitled to a charge with respect to an agency defense. The Appellate Division held that this issue had been preserved for appellate review and that "in the circumstances of this case, the failure to charge agency constituted reversible error” (68 AD2d 822, 823).

Our…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. ConaNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. KinderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  2. People v. RamirezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Kitt v. HaftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. People v. GarayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. McKinneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API