Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Angevine

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1899No. 11027PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from court of appeals, northern department; John H. Mahan, Abijah Wells, and Sam’l W. McElroy, judges.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Doster, O. J.

The principal plaintiff in error, the Standard Oil Company, as a-judgment creditor of the defendant in error, C. H. Angevine, issued an execution on its judgment, and caused it to be levied on a stock of intoxicating liquors belonging to the debtor. The liquors were sold under the execution, whereupon the defendant, Angevine, brought an action for damages for the wrongful conversion of his property. He recovered judgment for $102 in the district court. This judgment was affirmed by the court of appeals. Error is now prosecuted to this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Horn v. State ex rel. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Stephens v. BallouSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. State v. CountrymanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. DownenArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. City of Kansas v. KimballSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Unemployment Reserves Commission v. St. Francis Homes Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Unemployment Reserves Commission v. St. Francis Homes Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API