Legal Opinion

Dardess v. SouthTrust Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1989No. 88-736PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit on a promissory note brought by SouthTrust Bank of the Quad Cities against James A. Dardess. Dardess filed an answer alleging fraud in the procurement of the promissory note, failure of consideration, and breach of contract. Dardess also counterclaimed, alleging fraud and breach of contract. At the close of all the evidence, SouthTrust moved for a directed verdict, which the trial court granted but only as to Dardess's counterclaim for fraud. All other issues were submitted to a jury, which returned the following verdict: "We, the jury, find in favor of the Plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. P & S BUSINESS v. South Cent. Bell TelephoneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Russellville Production Credit Ass'n v. FrostSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Sims v. CallahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Watters v. Lawrence CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. Whitmore v. First City Nat. Bank of OxfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McDowell v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. First Commercial Bank v. SpiveySupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  3. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  4. Cp & B Enterprises, Inc. v. Mellert.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Hare v. PattersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API