Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Soler v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 6, 2014No. 3D11-2510Published

1ConcurrenceSalter, J.

I concur in the result, but I write to reaffirm two exceptions to the procedural default rule relied upon by the majority (dismissal based on the twenty day administrative appeal period, Florida Administrative Code Rule 38E-3.006). I disagree with the majority that the rule has “no good cause exceptions.” One exception is a due process exception, applicable when a claimant establishes that the decision itself was not timely mailed, that an incorrect address was used, or that the claimant never received the adverse decision. Brumm v. Unemployment App. Comm’n, 680 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 1st DCA…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Assam v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Arensen v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. Cornello v. UNEMP. APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  5. Brumm v. Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API