Ritzman v. Mills
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
The above-named actions are brought by two sisters on account of personal injuries sustained by them from an automobile driven by the defendant while the plaintiffs were crossing a certain street in the city of Pasadena. The actions were consolidated and tried together, submitted to the jury upon the same testimony, and a verdict was returned in each case in the sum of $5,000. The two cases are presented to us upon one transcript, and will be considered as one. From the judgments entered upon the verdicts, the defendant appeals in each case.
The record shows that the plaintiffs were both…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Hollinger v. York Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Storrs v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Reese v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Scally v. W. T. Garratt & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Beagle v. VasoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- McNulty v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- MacHado v. HarmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Beagle v. VasoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Sanguinetti v. Moore Dry Dock Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.