Czekanski v. Hanretta
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Macken, J.
In connection with an examination of plaintiff Marie Czekanski, consented to by plaintiffs, defendant secured from plaintiff on a form furnished by defendant, and purporting to be “ pursuant to the provisions of Section 3121 CPLR ”, written authorization “ to examine, and/or to obtain or make copies of all or portions of” certain hospital records. The authorization further stated “ I understand that, if copies of all or portions of said hospital records are obtained pursuant to this authorization, a duplicate copy thereof will be furnished *116to me by said attorneys In Ms letter enclosing the…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Tower v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Castagnazzi v. SchleckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990