Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1933No. 15497Published

1Opinion

*174ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant insists that refusal of his application for continuance was an error for which the judgment should be reversed. We find in the record an application for continuance, but no bill of exception complains of its refusal. It has been the consistent holding of this court that such complaint must be preserved by bill of exception. Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C., sec. 304; volume 4, Texas Jurisprudence, sec. 60; Pinkston v. State, 91 Texas Crim. Rep., 644, 241 S. W., 152; Martin v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 124, 242 S. W., 234; Miller v. State, 93 Texas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Pinkston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API