Legal Opinion
McAndrew v. Mularchuk
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 28, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. 172 (1960)
162 A.2d 820
WILLIAM F. McANDREW, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF ROBERT McANDREW, AN INFANT, AND FRANCES McANDREW, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
ANDREW MULARCHUK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG, A MUNICIPALITY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 25, 1960.
Reargued May 9, 1960.
Decided June 28, 1960.
Mr. Prospero DeBona argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Messrs. Milton, McNulty & Augelli, attorneys).
Mr. Joseph V. Cullum argued the cause for defendant-appellant, Borough of Keansburg (Messrs. Townsend & Doyle, attorneys;…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Collopy v. Newark Eye and Ear InfirmarySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Smith v. BrennanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hayden v. CurleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961