Legal Opinion

Flora Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 17, 1956No. 2; Appeal, No. 249PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The recital of the facts in the preceding opinion will supply the background for this appeal also.

When six of the children of Max Schulz deeded their respective interests in that decedent’s real estate to Edward Schulz for a consideration of $12,000 he understood that he had acquired “an absolute fee simple title in the premises” in accordance with a recital in the deed to that effect. Frank Schulz one of the six who signed the deed had only a life estate in the realty under the will; his children were the remaindermen. Edward Schulz set aside a one-seventh part of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Irish v. IrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Schulz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Spangler's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Moore v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API