Legal Opinion

Koth v. Board of Education

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 28, 1927No. 12299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

I do not agree with the disposition of this appeal indicated in the opinion of the Chief Justice for the following reasons:

The action is for the recovery of $250, an alleged balance due to the plaintiff by the defendant, under the terms of a written contract for the transportation by automobile truck of school children, during the school year 1925-1926.

It appears beyond dispute that in September, 1925, the parties entered into a written contract covering the matter. The plaintiff was to receive $125 per month for his service. A…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. FinniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Bradford v. President of the Union Bank of TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Stark Electric R. v. McGinty Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
  4. Callaham v. RidgewaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. McCauley v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. LandstromCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Wilson v. LandstromCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API