Koth v. Board of Education
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Cothran.
I do not agree with the disposition of this appeal indicated in the opinion of the Chief Justice for the following reasons:
The action is for the recovery of $250, an alleged balance due to the plaintiff by the defendant, under the terms of a written contract for the transportation by automobile truck of school children, during the school year 1925-1926.
It appears beyond dispute that in September, 1925, the parties entered into a written contract covering the matter. The plaintiff was to receive $125 per month for his service. A…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Taylor v. FinniganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Bradford v. President of the Union Bank of TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Stark Electric R. v. McGinty Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Callaham v. RidgewaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- McCauley v. KellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilson v. LandstromCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Wilson v. LandstromCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984