Lawrence T. Palmer v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Lawrence Palmer appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the United States in an action under the Federal Tort Claims Act. 742 F.Supp. 1068. We conclude that the Hawaii Recreational Use Statute (HRUS) immunizes the government from liability. We therefore affirm.
I
On June 23, 1988, Palmer visited the swimming pool at the Tripler Army Medical Center (TAMC) in Honolulu, Hawaii. Although not an employee, Palmer was permitted to enter the facility at no charge in order to accompany his grandchildren. The grandchildren were allowed to use the pool because…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
- Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Keelen v. State, Dept. of Culture, Recreation & TourismSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
- William E. Brock, Iii, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Writers Guild of America, West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Satey v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Viceroy Gold Corp. v. AubryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Frances Howard v. United States of America Us Sailing Association, Inc. Waikiki Yacht Club, a Hawaii Corporation Guy S. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Coughlin v. Tailhook Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Crichfield v. Grand Wailea Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.