Legal Opinion

Furlon v. Haystack Mountain Ski Area, Inc.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 6, 1978No. 261-77PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

On March 22, 1967, plaintiff-appellant Furlon, an employee of defendant-appellee Haystack, was severely injured while attempting to repair one of Haystack’s ski lifts. Appellant filed a workmen’s compensation claim, 21 V.S.A. § 601 et seq., and collected a sum of money from Hartford Insurance Group, Haystack’s insurance carrier.

On March 10, 1970, appellant sued the manufacturer of the ski lift, Mueller Lifts of Switzerland (and Ers P. Meyer d/b/a Mueller Lifts). In his complaint against Mueller appellant alleged negligence in the design and manufacture of the ski lift and breach of warranty.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. SeckingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Bennett v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  3. McLean v. Windham Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  4. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Hardinger Transfer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Rogers v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hamelin v. Simpson Paper (Vermont) Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1997
  2. Southwick v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  3. Rennie v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
  4. Town of Lyndon v. Burnett's Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. Tateosian v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API