Deidesheimer v. Deidesheimer
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Pembroke R. Flitcraft, J udge. The motion to modify the judgment having been filed at the term at which the judgment was rendered, was sufficient to save exceptions to the action of the court in rendering the judgment, although the motion was not filed within four days after the judgment was rendered; and this court will review the action of the trial court with respect to that portion of the judgment sought to be…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Pembroke R. Flitcraft, J udge. The motion to modify the judgment having been filed at the term at which the judgment was rendered, was sufficient to save exceptions to the action of the court in rendering the judgment, although the motion was not filed within four days after the judgment was rendered; and this court will review the action of the trial court with respect to that portion of the judgment sought to be modified. Childs v. R. R., 117 Mo. 414; Rattmann v. Schmucker, 94 Mo. 139; Randolph v. Sloan, 58 Mo. 155; Downing v. Still,…
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
— The defendant was granted a divorce from the plaintiff on her cross-bill. The charge was adultery. There were two children born of the marriage, one a boy fourteen years old, the other a girl, aged eleven years. The court gave defendant the custody of the children and awarded alimony in the sum of $60 per month. By the terms of the decree the plaintiff was to have the privilege of visiting the children once a week, conditioned upon the payment of the alimony. The plaintiff failed to file a motion for new trial or in arrest of judgment, but before the expiration of the term, he filed a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Dawson v. St. Louis Court of AppealsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Dubois v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Wilde v. WildeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Semrow v. SemrowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
- Chandler v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nelson v. NelsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Cole v. ColeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
- State ex rel. Tatum v. RameyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909
- West v. WestMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
- Rudd v. RuddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.