Legal Opinion

Godard v. Gould

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1853PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This action was brought to recover damages for the value of' certain goods and chattels, viz. a Fourdenier machine, shafting and gearing,

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, T. R Strong, J.

By the terms of the contract between the plaintiffs and Stoddard, Freeman & Co., the machinery was to be set up in the mill of the latter, the plaintiffs furnishing a suitable person to superintend that business, and the plaintiffs were to remain the owners of it until it should be paid for. The machinery was set up in the mill according to the contract, and the evidence clearly shows that the mode of annexation was such that it could be removed without injury to the building; that the building would after its removal, and without any labor or expense, be equally…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. JenksCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ford v. . CobbNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Sword v. LowIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Davis v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Sheldon v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Henkle v. DillonOregon Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API