Legal Opinion

Mobile O.R. Co. v. Clay

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1930No. 28031PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGowen, J.

The appellee, Clay, filed his declaration in the circuit court against the appellant, the railroad company, for damages for a personal injury — the loss of his right eye. The original declaration was filed July 9', 1927; it was subsequently amended; and the railroad pleaded the general issue and assumption of risks. The cause was submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict for fifteen thousand dollars, the court entered judgment therefor, and the railroad prosecutes an appeal here.

The original declaration sought recovery, based on the negligence of the appellant railroad, for the loss of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GroegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gulfport Creosoting Co. v. WhiteMississippi Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Goodwin v. MisticosMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Illinois Central Gulf R. Co. v. BoardmanMississippi Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Hercules Powder Co. v. CalcoteMississippi Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Louisville N.R. Co. v. RussellMississippi Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API