Legal Opinion

Hurtgen v. Kantrowitz

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Arapahoe County Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hayt

This action was commenced before a justice of the peace by attachment upon promissory notes not at the time due. In the affidavit several statutory grounds for attachment are alleged. This affidavit was traversed; and a motion to dissolve the same was interposed. The issue thus made was by consent tried with the trial upon the merits. The justice dissolved the attachment, and gave judgment upon the merits for the defendants. The record shows that an appeal was promptly taken “from the judgment aforesaid” to the county court, where the cause was tried to the court without the intervention of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Myers v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Holland v. HensleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nichols v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  2. King v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  3. Colby v. BirchArapahoe County District Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API