People v. Webb
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
If a picture is worth a thousand words, a moving picture is worth a million. Here, a surreptitiously recorded videotape served as an evidentiary bombshell by depicting appellant as a robust commercial fisherman, not a sedentary invalid entitled to $42,000 worth of in-home attendant care. Thus, Thomas Reed Webb was convicted of making a false or fraudulent statement to obtain workers’ compensation benefits (Ins. Code, § 1871.4, subd. (a)(1)) 1 , perjury (Pen. Code, § 118, subd. (a)), 2 and grand theft by false pretenses. (§ 487, subd. (a).) He contends the evidence is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. AvenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. DieguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Maureen K. v. TuschkaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Patarak v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. PostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.