Legal Opinion

People v. Webb

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 26, 1999No. B127289PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

YEGAN, J.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, a moving picture is worth a million. Here, a surreptitiously recorded videotape served as an evidentiary bombshell by depicting appellant as a robust commercial fisherman, not a sedentary invalid entitled to $42,000 worth of in-home attendant care. Thus, Thomas Reed Webb was convicted of making a false or fraudulent statement to obtain workers’ compensation benefits (Ins. Code, § 1871.4, subd. (a)(1)) 1 , perjury (Pen. Code, § 118, subd. (a)), 2 and grand theft by false pretenses. (§ 487, subd. (a).) He contends the evidence is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. People v. AvenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. PadillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. DieguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Maureen K. v. TuschkaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Patarak v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. PostCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API