Legal Opinion
Adams v. Postmates Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 5, 2020No. 4:19-cv-03042Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 OAKLAND DIVISION 10 11 JAMAL ADAMS, et al. Case No: 19-3042 SBA 12 Petitioners, ORDER DENYING POSTMATES’ MOTION TO STAY PENDING 13 vs. APPEAL 14 POSTMATES, INC., Dkt. 261 15 Respondent. 16 17 This matter is presently before the Court on Respondent Postmates, Inc.’s 18 (“Postmates”) Motion to Stay Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Cross-Motions 19 Pending Appeal (“Motion to Stay”). Dkt. 261. Having read and considered the papers filed 20 in connection with this matter and being fully informed, the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lamps Plus, Inc. v. VarelaSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Leiva-Perez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.