Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Southern Indiana Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1904No. 4,615Published

Erom Lawrence Circuit Court; W. E. Martin, Judge. Suit by tbe Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Eailway Company against the Southern Indiana Eailway Company. Erom a decree for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Dissent

*247Dissenting Opinion.

Wiley, P. J.

I cannot concur in the opinion reached by the majority of my associates, nor in the reasoning leading thereto. That I may fully express my views upon the legal questions involved, I deem it necessary to state fully the facts stated in the complaint.

In July, 1889, the Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Eailway Company owned and operated a line of railway, running north and south in and through Lawrence county, Indiana. At the city of Bedford, in said county, it maintained a statiop. and telegraph office. At that time the Evansville & Eichmond Eailway Company was…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Joy v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Whitney Arms Co. v. . BarlowNew York Court of Appeals · 1875

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API