Commonwealth v. Hartland
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Kenwobthey, J.,
This is an appeal from a conviction of burglary. Appellant asks us to grant a new trial because (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict 1 and (2) the court’s charge to the jury was inadequate in that it failed to instruct them on the circumstantial evidence rule.
Frank Mastrangelo, an alien, lived in a small shanty in Mifflin Township, Allegheny County. On August 25, 1940, appellant, a constable, went with a search warrant to Mastrangelo’s place and found an old shotgun, and a .32 revolver. He seized the weapons, placed Mastrangelo under arrest and put…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StefanczykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Commonwealth v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Commonwealth v. DelMarmolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. DelMarmolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.