Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hartland

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1941No. Appeal, 113PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Kenwobthey, J.,

This is an appeal from a conviction of burglary. Appellant asks us to grant a new trial because (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict 1 and (2) the court’s charge to the jury was inadequate in that it failed to instruct them on the circumstantial evidence rule.

Frank Mastrangelo, an alien, lived in a small shanty in Mifflin Township, Allegheny County. On August 25, 1940, appellant, a constable, went with a search warrant to Mastrangelo’s place and found an old shotgun, and a .32 revolver. He seized the weapons, placed Mastrangelo under arrest and put…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StefanczykSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Commonwealth v. KleinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. DelMarmolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. DelMarmolSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  5. Commonwealth v. EllisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API