Legal Opinion
Minsky v. Zieve
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 25, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
This is an action of contract to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiffs by reason of the refusal of the defendant to convey to them, in accordance with the terms of a written agreement, certain premises in Chelsea.
The agreement was entered into on April 16, 1923, and provides that the premises are to be conveyed by the defendant to the plaintiffs “on or before May 1, 1923, by a good and sufficient warranty deed of the party of the first part, conveying a good and clear title to the same free from all incumbrances except a first mortgage of $24,000 held by the Chelsea…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Borden v. BordenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Preferred Underwriters, Inc. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Cashman v. BeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Aiken v. SanfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809
- Roberts v. BassettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. National Shawmut BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Oberg v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Cobuzzi v. ParksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Dutton v. BennettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.