Legal Opinion

Mater v. Browning Bros. Amusement Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1928Published

1Opinion of the CourtPardee, J.

The parties stand in the same relative positions in this court as they did in the court of common pleas, which court directed a verdict for the defendant upon its motion, after the impaneling of a jury and before the introduction of any testimony.

The defendant, before said action was taken, made two motions to dismiss the case, in the following order, to-wit: First, because the court had not acquired jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, which motion was overruled. Second, because (a) the petition did not state a cause of action against the defendant, and (b) the petition, taken in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Haskins v. Alcott & HortonOhio Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Ohio Electric Railway Co. v. U. S. Express Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Smith v. FreshwaterOhio Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Globe Rolling Mill v. King & Co.Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1870
  5. Irvine v. ChurchDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API