Legal Opinion

City of Kansas City v. Graham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1996No. WD 52071Published

1Opinion of the Court

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.

Appellant David C. Graham appeals his conviction for speeding in violation of Kansas City, Missouri, Code of Ordinances § 34.90. Mr. Graham argues that the trial court should have dismissed the charge against him because the City of Kansas City does not have authority to charge him with speeding on Interstate 435. He also claims that Section 34.90 does not itself set a speed limit on Interstate 435, and the City failed to charge him with violation of any ordinance which does so. For the reasons set out below, neither claim has merit. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Kansas City v. MayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API