Legal Opinion

Frittz v. Thorpe

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 2, 1931No. 21952PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

This is a proceeding in quo warranto brought in the district court of Texas county by George M. Frittz, county attorney,, against Joe. H. Thorpe, S. S. Sullivan, and W. D. Waldrop, director, clerk, and member, respectively, of consolidated school district No. 15 of Texas county, and questions their right to hold their respective offices. Tfie canse, of! action is' based on the theory that the consolidated district was irregularly organized. On the same day plaintiff’s petition was filed, O. G. Westmore-land and others, as taxpayers of the school district, were granted leave to intervene.

In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sugart v. ThorpeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Wagoner County Election Board v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  3. State ex rel. Board of Regents v. McCloskey Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Robison v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. STATE EX REL. REGENTS v. McCLOSKEY BROS.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API