State v. Showen
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Fergus County; Jack Briscoe, Judge. Haeley S ho wen was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors, and appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
The defendant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, and appealed from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
The information was filed September 3, 1919. On April 14, 1920, the cause was set for trial for April 19. On the latter date the defendant moved for a continuance on the ground of the absence of witnesses, and in his affidavit set forth that his father and mother were then in the state of Missouri; that they “were with affiant all of the time alleged in the information on file herein, and know positively that affiant did not sell…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
- State v. PippiMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Territory v. HardingMontana Supreme Court · 1887
- State v. GibbsMontana Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. McLeodMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. BlakesleeMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- State v. CollinsMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- Gallego v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
- O'Neill v. WallMontana Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.