Legal Opinion

Ware v. Grand Lodge Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1929No. 21746. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute, having been to some extent stipulated, and no evidence having been introduced to contradict plaintiff’s witnesses.

Robert Ware was insured by appellant in June, 1916. Some time thereafter, he went to California for the benefit of his health, and was last heard from in 1919. The testimony conclusively shows that, prior to leaving for California, he had, at all times, made his home with his mother, the respondent, at Auburn, Washington; that he was a dutiful son; that, until the last time he was heard from, he regularly sent to his mother the money for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Trotter v. Grand Lodge of the Iowa Legion of HonorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Butler v. Supreme CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Samberg v. Knights of the Modern MaccabeesMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Gruwell v. National Council Knights & Ladies of SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
  5. Cobble v. Royal Neighbors of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. Security Benefit AssociationWashington Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API