Legal Opinion

Grindle v. Chastain

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1997No. A97A1399PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

This is a case to remove an obstruction from a private way. See OCGA § 44-9-59. A prior decision affirmed the trial court’s denial of Robert Grindle’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the mistrial (“Grindle F). Since the decision is unreported, it establishes the law of the case for the parties but does not constitute precedent. OCGA § 9-11-60 (h); Court of Appeals Rule 33 (b). Upon retrial, the jury found against Grindle, who now claims the court erred in failing to grant a directed verdict, in excluding certain evidence, and in failing to give all his requested jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Howard v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  2. Radio Webs, Inc. v. Tele-Media Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Padgett v. CowartSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  4. Asbury v. Georgia World Congress CenterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  5. Farris Construction Company, Inc. v. 3032 Briarcliff Road Associates Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Demorest v. Town of Mount AirySupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Higginbotham v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Trotman v. VELOCITEACH PROJECT MANAGEMENT, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Rome Healthcare, LLC v. Peach Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Southern Co. v. HamburgCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API