Legal Opinion

Mahro v. Greenwich Savings Bank

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1896Published

Appeal from order denying a motion to interplead one Charles Mahro, as a defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Dwyer, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion made by the defendant to interplead one Charles Mahro as the party defendant to the action and for other relief.

*276The motion was denied on the ground and for the reason that the petition of the defendant did not state the grounds' of the alleged claim by Charles Mahro and fails to show that the said Charles Mahro makes such claim to the fund that he should be made a party defendant, or for the granting of the other relief prayed for.

The motion was made under section 115,.chapter 689,- Laws of 1892, and it is therein provided, that “ In all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mars v. Albany Sav. BankNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Feldman v. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W.New York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API