Legal Opinion

Chambliss v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 1990No. 89-1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL, Chief Judge.

' Defendant, Roy Edward Chambliss, Jr., appeals the departure sentence imposed by the trial court, claiming that the sole reason stated for departure, that defendant’s crimes constituted a “crime wave,” is invalid. We agree. See State v. Simpson, 554 So.2d 506 (Fla.1989); Mathis v. State, 515 So.2d 214 (Fla.1987); State v. Rousseau, 509 So.2d 281 (Fla.1987). See also Towe v. State, 536 So.2d 398 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Morgan v. State, 528 So.2d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Hayes v. State, 516 So.2d 318 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Accordingly, defendant’s sentence is vacated and this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shull v. DuggerSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. State v. RousseauSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  4. Morgan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  5. Hayes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Saint v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API