Legal Opinion

Randolph v. Knox County

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 14, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Knox Circuit Court.—Hon. B. E. Turner, Judge. This case falls within the decision of Barnard v. Knox Co., 105 Mo. 382. It is neither denied nor questioned that the required levy under the constitution Was made.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Knox Circuit Court.—Hon. B. E. Turner, Judge. This case falls within the decision of Barnard v. Knox Co., 105 Mo. 382. It is neither denied nor questioned that the required levy under the constitution Was made. So any levy to exceed fifty cents on the $100 valuation is unconstitutional for' any debts except for the erection of public buildings or indebtedness existing prior to November 30, 1875. Black v. McGonigle, 103 Mo. 192; Barnard v. Knox Co., 105 Mo. 382. The case of Barnard v. Knox Co., 105 Mo. 382, has no application to the case at bar, for in that case the ■court held…

1Opinion of the CourtG-antt, P. J.

During the years 1884, 1885 and 1886, in payment for services lawfully rendered to Knox county, the county court of said county duly audited and allowed thirteen different accounts against said county, and, in pursuance of its orders, warrants on the treasurer of said county in due form of law in all respects were issued, signed by the presiding judge of the county court and countersigned by the county clerk, attested by the seal of the county clerk. They were not paid and were duly protested for non-payment. These several warrants were for value assigned in writing to plaintiff. On the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Clark County v. HackmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. State ex rel. National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Sueiras v. MonroigSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1931
  4. Sueiras v. MonroigSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API