Mullins v. Sutherland
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Dickenson county in an action of trover. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant assigns error.
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
The defendants in error agreed to sell to the plaintiff in error 500,000 oak staves, by a contract under seal, bearing date February 10, 1919, which was modified by a supplemental contract in writing not under seal, bearing date September 6, 1919. The contract called for complete delivery by September 15, 1919. The supplemental contract simply extended the time for delivery. The price to be paid for the staves was $57.00 per thousand “f. o. b. cars at Fremont, Va., or other points in Dickenson county,” on the orders of Mullins. The Sutherlands (who were the sellers, and designated in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Heryford v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Montenegro-Riehm Music Co. v. BeurisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- United Leasing Corp. v. Thrift Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- Boggs v. SettleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
- Wells Fargo Equipment Finance, Inc. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Mazi v. GilleyFairfax County Circuit Court · 1998
- National Surety Corp. v. Commonwealth Ford, Inc.Richmond City Circuit Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.