Houston v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HAIRE, Judge.
On this review by certiorari of an Industrial Commission award, the petitioning claimant contends that the Commission erred in applying the doctrine of res judi-cata and refusing to consider claimant’s contention that his average monthly wage had been incorrectly established.
*256On August 7, 1969, claimant, while working as a crop duster pilot, sustained an industrial injury. His claim for workmen’s compensation benefits was accepted by the respondent carrier, and on September 23, 1969, the carrier issued a notice of claims status and a notice of average monthly wage calculation…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Compensation Fund v. McCOMB AND INDUS. COM'NCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Aetna Insurance v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harvey Auto Supply Inc. v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Dutton v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989