Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Interurban Street Railway Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 23, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, ■ Second District. Action by James Johnson against the Interurban Street Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.

Plaintiff was a passenger on one of defendant’s cars which came south on Amsterdam avenue and proceeded easterly upon 125th street, its destination being Eighth avenue. The car, as it approached Eighth avenue, did not stop upon the main track, but crossed upon a short switch, and then stopped. The plaintiff was seated in the forward part of the car. After the car entered the switch, and just before it stopped, the plaintiff started to alight, and gives this account of the accident:

“The man with the uniform opened the door of the car, also the side door, and I was in a half-rising position,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. GosnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Smith v. Union Railway Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API