John F. v. Superior Court

Opinion

SIMS, Acting P. J.

Petitioners seek an extraordinary writ, pursuant to rule 39.IB of the California Rules of Court, to vacate the order of the respondent court directing that a hearing be held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 for the selection and implementation of a permanent plan. Petitioners phrase their principal contention as whether the respondent court provided them with inadequate reunification services by denying them visitation while imprisoned. We shall conclude that petitioners’ contention is a belated attack on the adequacy of the reunification plan…