Legal Opinion

Childrens Hose, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 21, 1965No. C.D. 2547PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

Plaintiff, by instituting this action, seeks to recover a portion of a duty paid on certain nylon tights or leotards which were assessed with duty at the rate of 25 cents per pound and 35 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1309 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, and the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, as underwear, knit, wholly or in chief value of rayon or other synthetic textile.

It is urged by plaintiff herein…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Amerex Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Amerex Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Childrens Hose, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Dessy Atco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. Dessy-Atco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API