Legal Opinion · Dissent
Barnett v. Simmons
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 10, 2008No. 103,708Published
1Dissent
WATT, J., with whom OPALA, J.
joins, dissenting:
T1 I dissent for the reasons expressed in the dissent to the Court of Civil Appeals opinion, 11 38 providing:
"When there is no motion for sanctions pending and a plaintiff dismisses his claims the trial court loses jurisdiction to act further in the matter. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Carpenter, 1978 OK 39, 576 P.2d 1166, 1168; Elliott v. McCaleb, 2006 OK CIV APP 87, 139 P.3d 253, 255-256; McCully v. Wil-Mc Oil Co. 1994 OK CIV APP 111, 879 P.2d 150, 153." [Footnotes omitted.]
2Cases cited3 opinions
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Elliott v. McCalebCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- McCully v. Wil-Mc Oil Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994