Legal Opinion

Com. Ex Rel. Conrad v. Ashe, Warden

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1940No. 145 Misc. DocketPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The relator in this habeas corpus proceeding presents three grounds for discharge:

1. That the indictments, which were prepared under the Act of April 15, 1907, P. L. 62, without presentation to the Grand Jury and the finding of true bills, were not signed by the District Attorney. See Com. ex rel. Mayernick v. Ashe, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 421, 12 A. 2d 452.

2. That these indictments, which charged the defendant with Robbery, did not allege that he used an offensive weapon, or that any other person was with him when the robberies occurred, and, therefore, he avers, did not come within…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Mayernick v. Ashe, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BelcherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Paylor v. CavellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Com. Ex Rel. Banky v. Ashe, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Graham v. ClaudySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. Com. Ex Rel. Dende v. Ashe, WardenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API