Legal Opinion

Georgia Power Co. v. Hand

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1933No. 7082PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Appellant made claim in the bankruptcy proceedings of Newman to electric refrigerating machinery which it had sold him by “retained title” contract. The claim was denied on the ground that though physically recorded, the recordation was ineffective because the instrument was not attested or acknowledged as required by law. Cunningham v. Cureton, 96 Ga. 489, 23 S. E. 420.

Appellant comes here relying on the Act of August 27, 1931, Georgia Laws of 1931, p. 153, and Donovan v. Simmons, 96 Ga. 340, 22 S. E. 966, as giving its lien validity except as against innocent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cunningham & Co. v. CuretonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  2. Donovan v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  3. Webb v. United-American Soda Fountain Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
  4. People's First Nat. Bank of Quitman v. Coe Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Hoa Cam LamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  2. B. F. Avery & Sons Co. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  3. Avery and Sons Company v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API