Legal Opinion · Dissent

Leopold v. Bradford-Hutchinson Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 2, 1931No. 27999Published

1DissentO’Niell, C. J.

I do not subscribe to the proposition that one whose timber has been felled and removed from the land by another is entitled to more damages if the party who took the timber was in bad faith than if he acted in good . faith. In' that respect the prevailing opinion . rendered in this case cannot be' reconciled with the doctrine, which is well established by the following decisions, that punitive damages cannot be allowed in a civil action, viz.: Serio v. American Brewing Co., 141 La. 291, 74 So. 998, L. R. A. 1917E, 516; Vincent v. Morgan’s La. & T. R. & S. S. Co., 140 La. 1027, 74 So. 541;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moulin v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
  2. Vincent v. Morgan's Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Serio v. American Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  4. St. Paul v. Louisiana Cypress Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  5. Spearman v. Toye Bros. Auto & Taxicab Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API