Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Taylor v. Reincke

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 25, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 10102PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLUMENFELD, District Judge.

A petition for a writ of habeas corpus was submitted October 23, 1963 by Samuel Taylor, a state prisoner, pro se. On the same date, permission to proceed in forma pauperis was granted. An order to file a written return to show cause why the writ should not be granted and for a hearing limited to arguments thereon, without the necessity of producing the state prisoner, was issued. When the exhibits introduced at the hearing plus the state court’s habeas corpus file, which this court called for and received, disclosed a tangled web of the petitioner’s prior pro se…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RouxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Phillips v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1969
  3. United States ex rel. Mallette v. ReinckeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1965
  4. Welch v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API