Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Warner

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 24, 1896PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the order of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County (Lynch, J.), directing that the name of B. II. Warner be placed upon the list of qualified voters of that county. The facts appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bryan, J,,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

It was decided after proper proceedings, in the Circuit Court for Montgomery Connty, that Brainard H. Warner should be registered as a voter. If he had been a resident of the State of Maryland for a year, and of Montgomery County for six months next preceding the ensuing election, he was entitled to be registered, but not otherwise.

We will examine the evidence offered to prove residence. It was shown that from the year eighteen hundred and eighty-five to eighteen hundred and ninety-two, he resided continuously at No. 2100 Massachusetts avenue,…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Martinez Ex Rel. Morales v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Maryland Green Party v. Maryland Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Bainum v. KalenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Blount v. BostonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Toll v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API