Legal Opinion
Merced v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 21, 2025No. 3:22-cv-01160Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JAIME B. MERCED, Case No. 3:22-cv-01160-IM Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR NEW v. TRIAL AND TAXING IN PART DEFENDANT’S BILL OF COSTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Edward M. Bull III & Kurt Micklow, Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss LLP, 955 Harbor Drive, Suite 130, San Diego, CA 92101, and Charles Robinowitz, 1211 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 2323, Portland, OR 97204. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Frank J. Anders & Susan F. Shapiro, Trial Attorneys, and Eric Kaufman-Cohen, Attorney in Charge, U.S. Department of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- John D. Chapman v. Ai TransportCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Taniguchi v. Kan Pacific Saipan, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.