Legal Opinion

Freitas v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1998PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered October 2, 1996, which, inter alia, granted defendant Lehrer & McGovern, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on the Labor Law § 241 (6) claims and dismissed said claims and denied the motion with respect to the claim under Labor Law § 200, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of denying that portion of defendant’s motion directed against the *185claim based on a violation of Labor Law § 241 (6) and 12 NYCRR 23-1.28 (b), reinstating that claim, and otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Plaintiff Antonio…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Rizzuto v. L.A. Wenger Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Gawel v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Tishman Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Jehle v. Adams Hotel AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Brasch v. Yonkers Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Picchione v. Sweet Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. Sheppard v. Blitman/Atlas Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API