Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 4, 1990No. 90-164PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Affirmed. Occhicone v. State, 570 So.2d 902 (Fla.1990); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Duest v. State, 462 So.2d 446 (Fla.1985); Jones v. State, 289 So.2d 725 (Fla.1974); State v. Miller, 555 So.2d 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Peterson v. State, 505 So.2d 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Wooten v. State, 464 So.2d 640 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 475 So.2d 696 (Fla.1985).

Regarding the issue of retrograde extrapolation of blood alcohol levels, we re-certify to the Florida Supreme Court the same question of great public importance certified in Miller.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Occhicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Duest v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Wooten v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Gallagher v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  3. State v. OakleyCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API