Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Julian Martin, Inc.

Tom Glaze, Judge.

In this eminent domain case, appellant appeals from a jury verdict and judgment in favor of appellee for $108,000.00. For reversal, appellant contends that the trial court erred in (1) permitting questioning and testimony as to the development and planned expansion of the business located on the property in question, and (2) denying motions to strike the testimony of a part-owner of the appellee and one of appellee’s expert witnesses. We affirm.

In 1977, appellee purchased a tract of land south of Bates-ville on Highway 25, on which it began operating a trucking terminal. In…