Legal Opinion

Laporte v. Royal Globe Indemnity Co.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided July 1, 1974No. 80; No. 49654PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTamkin, J.

This is an action of contract to recover under Counts 1 and 2 for property damage sustained to her motor vehicle and under Count 3 for double damages and reasonable attorney fees under the provisions of G.L. c. 90, § 340. The answer is a general denial.

We summarize the evidence as follows: The defendant had issued to the plaintiff a motor vehicle insurance policy affording property damage coverage for the year of 1972. The plaintiff purchased this policy from the Brook-field Insurance Agency (Brookfield) in Brock-ton, Massachusetts. The plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lehan v. North Main Street Garage, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Meunier's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  3. Brown v. RobinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  4. New York Central Railroad v. New England Merchants National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  5. Appleton v. Massachusetts Parking AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. La Porte v. Royal Globe Indemnity Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Goldstein v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts District Court · 1981
  3. Goldstein v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API