Farash v. Versprille

Order affirmed, *729with costs. All concur, Goldman, J. not participating. Memorandum: The petitions in these six consolidated tax review proceedings substantially comply with the pleading requirements of section 706 of the Real Property Tax Law and CPLR 3026 (see People ex rel. Ward v Sutton, 230 NY 339, 341; and see also, Matter of Great Eastern Mall v Condon, 36 NY2d 544, 548). Appellant contends that the applications to the board of review and the petitions fail to state claims for relief by reason of overvaluation because each stated a full market value of the tax parcels greater than the…